Q4 2026 In progress

FDA framework (21 CFR)

United States medicine and device regulation, currently being integrated. Intended scope: prescription drug advertising, device labelling, electronic records.

Q4 2026 Planned

Validating corrections inside the application

Apply the suggested correction on a finding, adjust it, then approve it, without leaving the project or reopening the document elsewhere.

Q4 2026 Planned

Final report, downloadable once approved

Once findings are arbitrated and corrections approved, a final report carrying the decisions taken, to attach to the file.

Q4 2026 Planned

Timestamped fingerprint and table of contents on the PDF report

The report already downloads as PDF, CSV and HTML. It will receive a timestamped fingerprint and a table of contents, for internal audit and regulatory submission requirements.

Q1 2027 Planned

Corrections applied inside your documents

Hand back the corrected document, not only the list of corrections to carry over by hand. This is where the product is heading: the review ends in the file, not in a report.

Q1 2027 Planned

ISO 13485 framework

Document control, review and approval of documents, for medical device manufacturers. Prioritised alongside the FDA.

Q1 2027 Planned

Word and PowerPoint uploads

Today a review runs on a digital PDF. Word and PowerPoint will follow, with the same traceability back to the quoted passage.

Q2 2027 Planned

Product suggestions put to a vote

Suggest an improvement from the roadmap, put it to the vote of other users and be notified when it reaches production. Pushed back behind the review workstreams.

Shipped

Automatic watch on regulatory texts

Each framework's source page is re-checked periodically. When the text changes, the regulatory team is alerted and the coverage is revised.

Shipped

Verified backups and an admin inventory

Encrypted backups verified before every deployment, a fourteen-day retention, and an admin screen listing the backups present on the host.

Shipped

Organisations, four roles and account switching

A client account can invite several users. Four roles (owner, admin, member, viewer), a shared credit ledger, an audit of actions per user, and switching between organisations.

Shipped

Public service status page

Incidents confirmed by the team are published on an open page, with the history of the last ninety days.

Shipped

Choice of report language

The report comes out in French or English, whatever the language of the reviewed document, which may be Spanish, German, Italian, Portuguese or Dutch.

Shipped

Monthly subscription and credit packs

Card payment, a monthly subscription renewed until you ask us to stop it, credit packs at a firm price and free top-ups from 100 credits.

Shipped

Referrals

Every organisation has a referral link and sees the sign-ups it brought in. The reward is agreed with the team.

Shipped

Two-factor authentication

By email or authenticator app (TOTP), with revocable trusted devices and a block after five wrong codes. Hardened in early September: emailed codes now expire after an hour.

Shipped

Report exportable as PDF, CSV and HTML

Every review produces a report downloadable in all three formats, findings, quoted passages and sources included.

Shipped

Progressive delay on resending the verification email

The "Resend email" button can no longer be used in a loop. The delay increases progressively (60s → 5min → 30min → 2h → 24h), with automatic reset after 24h of inactivity. Atomic database protection against double clicks. The verification waiting page shows the countdown in real time.

Shipped

Claude review in production

Reviews are processed by Claude (Anthropic) in real conditions: versioned instructions, per-stage traceability, usage tracking, circuit breaker on provider incidents.

FAQ · Roadmap

How to read the statuses?
Shipped = in production today, on the date shown. In progress = active development. Planned = committed on the roadmap, in the quarter shown. There is no other status.
Are the dates firm?
No. The quarters are indicative. Quality comes before the date. When an item slips, the status moves, in the open.
Can I suggest an evolution?
User voting is planned, with no firm date. Until then, write to us: we read everything and take it into account when prioritising.
Why does a given framework come later?
Prioritisation takes into account the volume of client requests, the stability of the text, and the availability of a domain expert to validate coverage. The order is not fixed.

An idea for EryonOne?

Suggestions put to a vote are still at the planned stage. Until then, write to us, or create your account to follow the updates.

More about EryonOne