Our promise

We do not replace you.

EryonOne saves you the hours that should not be yours. It identifies the points to arbitrate, suggests a correction on each one, lets you decide. The decision stays with your team. The material, we handle it.

01 On every finding

Three gestures, always the same

A card. A quoted passage, a detected issue, an applicable reference, a suggestion. You decide in one read.

Identify

Spot the points to check

The AI runs the document through its 4 axes. Each finding is tied to its axis (regulatory, scientific, format, linguistic) and to the exact passage in the document; regulatory and scientific findings also quote the reference text.

Suggest

A reasoned suggestion

On each finding, a correction proposal or a reasoned opinion. The reference text is quoted in clear. You see what the AI read to produce the proposal, you judge its relevance in seconds.

Arbitrate

Accept, dismiss, follow up

One decision per finding (accept or dismiss), then the fix is followed through, open or resolved. Each choice is traced in the project with the user, the timestamp and an optional comment, and stays available to defend a decision or pick the file back up later.

02 Before / With

What moves from one side to the other

Spotting the errors, then drafting the correction: that is the long part. EryonOne takes it on and hands the decision back to you.

Before

Manual review

  • Manual review, in several passes.
  • Sources to find by hand.
  • No structured trace of decisions.
  • Risk of omission or inconsistency from one version to another.
  • Long time, heavy mental load on cumulative topics.

With EryonOne

Augmented review

  • Findings classified by axis, produced in a single pass.
  • Reference text quoted next to regulatory and scientific findings.
  • Suggestion + opinion on each point raised.
  • Decision documented per user, timestamped.
  • Report exportable as PDF, CSV or HTML, findings and sources included.
03 In the field

What changes depending on the role

Regulatory affairs

Fewer Notified Body responses

Missing mentions, unsourced claims, internal contradictions in the file are raised before submission. Fewer reworks, fewer back-and-forths.

Medical / scientific

More time for arbitration

You no longer lose half a day cross-checking a figure with its source. EryonOne places the data next to the reference you uploaded. Bibliographic search itself is not in the product: it is handled as a service with EryonAgence.

Medical communication

Sharper brochures

Each promotional claim is checked against ANSM doctrine and against the SmPC you upload as a reference. Mandatory statements, CE marking, UDI and leaflet cross-references are checked.

Quality / SOP

Internal document consistency

The same fact stated differently in two places is flagged. By uploading your procedures and style guides as requirements, you have the document judged against your own rules, not only against public texts.

What it does not change

The final decision stays with the experts

EryonOne is an assistant, not a validator. Business responsibility (regulatory, medical, quality, legal) stays with your teams. The report is working material, not an approval. The goal is not to replace a senior reviewer; it is to eliminate the hours that senior reviewer should not be doing.

Frequently asked questions

Concretely, what do I gain on a file?
You no longer leave a review with a list of questions to dig into. You leave with a list of points + one proposal per point. The time spent piecing sources together and wording a correction is absorbed by the AI.
On which documents does EryonOne really make a difference?
Documents where consistency between sections matters (a technical-file chapter, an investigator brochure, a clinical report) and promotional material where each claim must be traced to a source (ANSM, SmPC). Beyond roughly a hundred pages, split the file by chapter.
Can the AI be wrong on a finding?
Yes. That is why each finding quotes its passage and, when it relies on a text, its source, with a confidence score shown next to it. If the AI hallucinates a reference or misreads a text, you see it and dismiss it in one click.
How is the arbitration traced?
Each decision (accept or dismiss) is recorded with the user, the timestamp and an optional comment, then followed through to its fix, open or resolved. The trace stays available in the project.
Can my team work together on the same file?
Yes. One organisation brings together several users, with four roles (owner, admin, member, viewer), a shared credit ledger, findings assigned to an owner with a priority and a due date, and per-user action tracing.
Does EryonOne replace a senior reviewer?
No. EryonOne provides the material. The regulatory, medical or quality decision stays with your experts. The report is working material, not an approval.

Test on a short document

Your first review is free, to be used within 30 days. You keep control over your documents.

Create my account See pricing What you can upload

More about EryonOne

The frameworks we cover

MDR by class, IVDR, ANSM doctrine, Directive 2001/83/EC, French Public Health Code: the exact scope of every active framework, and the ones planned next.

The requirements you can upload

Procedures, charters, claim matrices, licensed standards: the sector-by-sector list of documents to upload as requirements in EryonOne.

The product roadmap

What is shipped, in progress and planned in EryonOne: dated releases, upcoming work announced by quarter.